Formerly known as Wikibon

Breaking Analysis: Emerging Tech Vendors Face COVID Headwinds as Buyers Choose ‘Safe Bets’

Are emerging tech companies facing a tougher road ahead due to the pandemic? The data suggests that’s the case.

CIOs and IT buyers are fleeing to safer bets in the post-COVID economy. This is a key finding of the latest survey from ETR’s Emerging Technology Study. This trend continues the theme we highlighted coming into 2020 that organizations were experimenting less and narrowing spend on emerging technologies as they begin to operationalize digital initiatives. 

This trend is generally negative for emerging vendors, however there are some clear exceptions that we’ll highlight. 

Welcome to this episode of theCUBE Insights, Powered by ETR. In this segment we share the latest survey data from ETR’s most recent study focusing on privately held companies. Once again, we welcomed in Sagar Kadakia, ETR’s Director of Research to explain the nuances in the data. 

Emerging Technologies Drill Down Methodology

Twice each year, ETR conducts specific research to evaluate the performance of private companies in the data set. 

More than 800 CIOs and IT buyers participated in the most recent survey, covering more than 350 private companies and frameworks. As shown in the graphic above, specific questions were asked of each respondent as to their evaluation and deployment intentions. Respondents were asked to comment on those vendors with which they were familiar. 

COVID-19 Causes a Flight to Perceived Safety

On balance, respondents are more selective with regard to placing bets on emerging technologies. As shown in the graphic below, 44% of respondents indicate they will decrease spending on emerging technologies as a direct result of the pandemic. 

Not surprisingly, the risk tolerance of buyers is lower due to coronavirus. Unless the private provider fills a gap that larger, public companies can’t deliver, buyers will favor larger players, with some exceptions that we’ll highlight in the sector discussions. 

 

Decrease in Spending Relative to Earlier Studies in the Fortune 1000


The graphic below shows a data cut that isolates the Fortune 1000, comparing the most recent ETR Emerging Technology Study to earlier surveys. The blue line shows the average percentage of respondents that are aware of a technology but have no plans to deploy. The green line shows the percentage of respondents that either plan or are currently evaluating the emerging technology. Notably:

  • The average percentage of respondents who are aware of the technology but have no plans to evaluate jumped from the mid-40s in previous surveys to 52% in the latest data set;
  • The percentage of respondents planning to evaluate or currently evaluating dropped from the mid-20’s in previous surveys to 17% in the latest round.  

While this data is generally negative for many emerging technology players, there are some standouts in the sectors. 

Information Security

We’ve reported for some time that investments in cyber security will shift from hardening the perimeter (i.e. the moat around the castle) to protecting distributed infrastructure. The pandemic has accelerated this trend with endpoint security and so-called “zero trust” solutions seeing momentum. Some of the public companies we’ve highlighted that are benefiting from this trend include Crowdstrike, Okta, Zscaler among others. 

ETR tracks over 78 private emerging security companies and a few are seeing momentum in the form of higher planned/current evaluations or deployments. The upper right (green) section in the chart below shows companies that are seeing momentum in the survey measuring those customer responses that plan to evaluate within 6 months, are currently evaluating, have evaluated and plan to use and those that are allocating more. The lower left (red) are those companies with lower scores by this definition. 

Two standouts are BitSight, a security rating service, and Aqua, which provides container security. WSO2 (IAM, API Management), UnifyID (IAM), and Auth0 (IAM) are seeing notable upticks in buyer sentiment. Netskope (Cloud Security), Thycotic (IAM) and OneLogin (IAM) are also seeing opportunities within enterprise accounts, though these vendors are seeing a bit more churn according to ETR data analysis. 

Database & Data Warehousing: Snowflake Separates from the Pack

We probably sound like a broken record with regard to Snowflake but the data tell a strong story. In many ways, Snowflake is a safer bet as it has a proven track record, is well-financed and is reportedly preparing to move forward with an IPO this year. 

Redis Labs, the in-memory specialist and Datastax, which simplifies Cassandra deployments show strong. In many ways the database landscape shown on the chart below comprises companies that offer different products for a variety of use cases. 

Snowflake is emerging as a leader in analytic database, MariaDB is more focused on relational/operational workloads, while Datastax, Couchbase, Redis, Aerospike and Cockroach Labs have roots in non-relational environments. 

Infrastructure-as-Code Benefits from the Automation Mandate

The idea of automation has gone from scary several years ago, to something to consider to mandate, as the COVID work from home pivot makes digital business compulsory.

In 2010, as the cloud was rising from the ashes of the financial crisis, Mitchell Hashimoto created Vagrant to simplify configuration management. This led to the formation of Hashicorp which eventually developed Terraform, a platform which is gaining traction in cross-cloud configuration management. 

As shown in the graphic below, Hashi tooling is well-positioned in the ETR dataset with Terraform showing strong. Vault is also showing momentum. Vault is Hashi’s security play for protecting sensitive data such as credentials and API keys and is part of the company’s monetization strategy. 

Notably, the cloud players have disrupted the likes of Chef, Puppet and SaltStack, which are all showing elevated churn levels in the ETR data set. 

This quote from an ETR Venn CIO participant sums up the dynamic that is playing out in the configuration management space: 

The Terraform tool creates an entire infrastructure in a box. … Unlike [vendors that use] procedural languages like Ansible … and Chef, it will show the infrastructure the way you want it to be. You don’t have to worry about the things that happen underneath it. I know some companies where you can put your entire Amazon infrastructure through Terraform. If Amazon disappears, if your entire availability zone drops with all 200 servers, load balancers, RDS, et cetera, you just run Terraform, and everything will be created magically in ten minutes” (Director of DevOps, Services/Consulting, Large Organization, North America | VENN 3.132, 1/30/2020).

The chart above compares a number of different types of tools. For example, GitLab specializes in application tools to deploy code more efficiently. Docker is a well-known open source container platform and Turbonomic focuses on application resource management and performance management. So different tools for different jobs but all in the same general category. 

API Development and Management Sees Increased Adoption

In the API infrastructure space, Postman is currently showing strong momentum with utilization rates rivaling Hashi and GitLab tools. 

As well, WSO2, according to the ETR data, is one of the few infrastructure software players that saw improvements in Net Sentiment relative to six months ago. 

Finally, Mulesoft (now Salesforce) and Apigee (Google) show strong momentum in the survey data. 

Will there be a Shakeout in Private Firms? 

In a word, yes. We believe that there will be a natural tendency, especially among large buyers, to flee to perceived safe bets. This will put increased pressure on those emerging suppliers that have not achieved escape velocity, are not well-capitalized or don’t have strong ecosystem support. 

As witnessed in many mainstream markets, we see bifurcation occurring in many sectors where emerging vendors play. We think this will lead to increased consolidation through mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Large, established companies will freeze markets where necessary and look to fill gaps in their product lines through M&A. 

However private companies that are well capitalized and have a disruptive value proposition relative to legacy technologies could prove to be diamonds in the rough. These firms could bring competitive advantage to buyers willing to absorb some extra risk.

What’s Next from theCUBE Insights & ETR

ETR’s latest COVID impact survey is in market and over the next several weeks we’ll be reporting on the data trends that emerge. Currently we’re holding at a 4-5% decline in IT budgets for 2020 but we’ll keep you updated as the survey data comes in. 

In the meantime, we’re thankful to our community and the input you provide to these segments.

Look for updates on the ETR Website and make sure to check out SiliconANGLE for all the news and analysis.

Remember these episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen.

Ways to get in touch:  Email david.vellante@siliconangle.com | DM @dvellante on Twitter | Comment on our linkedin posts.

Also, you may want to check out this ETR Tutorial we created, which explains the spending methodology in more detail.

Watch this week’s full video analysis:

 

Keep in Touch

Thanks to Alex Myerson and Ken Shifman on production, podcasts and media workflows for Breaking Analysis. Special thanks to Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight who help us keep our community informed and get the word out. And to Rob Hof, our EiC at SiliconANGLE.

Remember we publish each week on theCUBE Research and SiliconANGLE. These episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen.

Email david.vellante@siliconangle.com | DM @dvellante on Twitter | Comment on our LinkedIn posts.

Also, check out this ETR Tutorial we created, which explains the spending methodology in more detail.

Note: ETR is a separate company from theCUBE Research and SiliconANGLE. If you would like to cite or republish any of the company’s data, or inquire about its services, please contact ETR at legal@etr.ai or research@siliconangle.com.

All statements made regarding companies or securities are strictly beliefs, points of view and opinions held by SiliconANGLE Media, Enterprise Technology Research, other guests on theCUBE and guest writers. Such statements are not recommendations by these individuals to buy, sell or hold any security. The content presented does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. You and only you are responsible for your investment decisions.

Disclosure: Many of the companies cited in Breaking Analysis are sponsors of theCUBE and/or clients of theCUBE Research. None of these firms or other companies have any editorial control over or advanced viewing of what’s published in Breaking Analysis.

You may also be interested in

Book A Briefing

Fill out the form , and our team will be in touch shortly.

Skip to content